Fact Check: FAKE Image Of Aramco Tower In Riyadh After Houthi Attack Is AI-Generated

Fact Check

  • by: Uliana Malashenko
Fact Check: FAKE Image Of Aramco Tower In Riyadh After Houthi Attack Is AI-Generated AI Pic

Does a viral image actually show Aramco Tower in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, after the Houthi attack in November 2026? No, that's not true: The picture was not a real photo documenting the aftermath. Five online tools determined the viral image was AI-generated.

The claim appeared in a post (archived here) on X where it was published by @adoneikam on Nov. 9, 2026. It opened:

Shame on the people & those in the media who are attempting to downplay the Houthi terror attack on the Aramco Tower in Riyadh. Terrorism is terrorism, regardless of the target, regardless of who the terrorists are.

This is what the attached image looked like on X at the time of publication:

HWrH0SGa8AAcuE9.jpg

(Image source: post by @adoneikam on X.)

The implication was that the picture shared on X was a real photo documenting the aftermath of the Nov. 8, 2026, attack on Riyadh (archived here) that Iran-backed Yemen's Houthis claimed (archived here and here) and left the Aramco skyscraper damaged. The Saudi energy ministry, cited by the New York Times (archived here) among others, described the degree of impact as "minor"; the newspaper's reporter on location said that there were "shattered windows and black marks" on the tower's surface and that "at least one floor of the roughly 30-story tower appeared to be severely damaged, leaving a gaping hole in the building."

The viral image reviewed in this fact check, however, was not a real photo -- it was made by AI.

Online AI detection tool Pangram said the image was very likely made by AI:

Screenshot 2026-11-10 at 10.31.38 AM.png

(Image source: Pangram.)

AI or Not estimated that the picture was 94% likely to contain generative AI:

Screenshot 2026-11-10 at 10.33.11 AM.png

(Image source: AI or Not.)

Sightengine said that the odds of that were 99%:

Screenshot 2026-11-10 at 10.29.50 AM.png

(Image source: Sightengine.)

ZeroGPT ruled that the image was "99% FAKE":

Screenshot 2026-11-10 at 10.37.34 AM.png

(Image source: ZeroGPT.)

Finally, the SynthID detector found an invisible watermark automatically added to some AI-generated content. According to the tool, the image in question "was made or edited with OpenAI":

Screenshot 2026-11-10 at 11.03.10 AM.png

(Image source: SynthID.)

Want to inform others about the accuracy of this story?

See who is sharing it (it might even be your friends...) and leave the link in the comments.:


  Uliana Malashenko

Uliana Malashenko joined Lead Stories as a freelance fact checking reporter in March 2022. Since then, she has investigated viral claims about U.S. elections and international conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine, among many other things. Before Lead Stories she spent over a decade working in broadcast and digital journalism, specializing in covering breaking news and politics. She is based in New York.

Read more about or contact Uliana Malashenko

About Us

EFCSN International Fact-Checking Organization

Lead Stories is a fact checking website that is always looking for the latest false, misleading, deceptive or inaccurate stories, videos or images going viral on the internet.
Spotted something? Let us know!.

Lead Stories is a:


Subscribe to our newsletter

* indicates required

Please select all the ways you would like to hear from Lead Stories LLC:

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here.

Google Preferred Source

Get more fact-checks in your Google Search results by setting up leadstories.com as one of your preferred sources.

Most Read

Most Recent

Share your opinion