Fact Check: 2015 Article About Lab-Made Coronavirus Triggers Debate

Fact Check

  • by: Lead Stories Staff
Fact Check: 2015 Article About Lab-Made Coronavirus Triggers Debate

Does an article from a scientific journal in 2015 about a lab-made coronavirus refer to the current outbreak? No, that's not true, and here is some context: While the facts in The Scientist article appear to be accurate, the opinion piece is about a research study that is unrelated to the current coronavirus that originated in Wuhan, China, and has already claimed more than 25 lives.

Users are sharing the article published by The Scientist on November 16, 2015, titled "Lab-Made Coronavirus Triggers Debate" (archived here) to drum up conspiracies or sound alarms. The article opened:

The creation of a chimeric SARS-like virus has scientists discussing the risks of gain-of-function research.

Ralph Baric, an infectious-disease researcher at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, last week (November 9) published a study on his team's efforts to engineer a virus with the surface protein of the SHC014 coronavirus, found in horseshoe bats in China, and the backbone of to one that causes human-like severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in mice. The hybrid virus could infect human airway cells and caused disease in mice, according to the team's results, which were published in Nature Medicine.

Users on social media only saw this:

Lab-Made Coronavirus Triggers Debate

The creation of a chimeric SARS-like virus has scientists discussing the risks of gain-of-function research.

People sharing the article on social media are suggesting the current coronavirus was "lab-made." Here are a couple of examples:

The 2015 article, labeled a "news & opinion" piece, discussed the debate in the scientific community about so-called "gain-of-function" research. This type of study carries the risk of transmitting "potential pandemic pathogens (PPPs)," according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH). It has raised biosafety and biosecurity red flags.

The article in The Scientist even noted that the agency had placed a moratorium on federal funding of these studies. The NIH stated in 2013:

NIH has funded such studies because they help define the fundamental nature of human-pathogen interactions, enable the assessment of the pandemic potential of emerging infectious agents, and inform public health and preparedness efforts.

At issue, according to the article: a November 9, 2015, study published by an infectious-disease researcher at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The research had been published in the journal Nature Medicine and demonstrated these findings:

We synthetically re-derived an infectious full-length SHC014 recombinant virus and demonstrate robust viral replication both in vitro and in vivo. Our work suggests a potential risk of SARS-CoV re-emergence from viruses currently circulating in bat populations.

This 2015 article from The Scientist about a gain-of-function study that created a SARS-like virus does not mean this current coronavirus outbreak was engineered then - or was even human-made at all.

The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal report that at least 26 deaths have been attributed to the current outbreak so far. On Chinese social media, people are expressing distrust of the authorities in Wuhan, and there are fears the government mishandled the outbreak.

Lead Stories reached out to The Scientist to add an editor's note or addendum to the story because the article is widely being misappropriated online:

Bottom line: the research discussed in the 2015 opinion piece from The Scientist does not relate to this current Wuhan coronavirus outbreak.

Want to inform others about the accuracy of this story?

See who is sharing it (it might even be your friends...) and leave the link in the comments.:

Lead Stories is working with the CoronaVirusFacts/DatosCoronaVirus Alliance, a coalition of more than 100 fact-checkers who are fighting misinformation related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Learn more about the alliance here.

About Us

International Fact-Checking Organization Meta Third-Party Fact Checker

Lead Stories is a fact checking website that is always looking for the latest false, misleading, deceptive or inaccurate stories, videos or images going viral on the internet.
Spotted something? Let us know!.

Lead Stories is a:


Subscribe to our newsletter

* indicates required

Please select all the ways you would like to hear from Lead Stories LLC:

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here.

Most Read

Most Recent

Share your opinion