Fact Check: Biden White House Freeze of Trump Executive Order Did NOT Cause Insulin Prices To Increase

Fact Check

  • by: Lead Stories Staff
Fact Check: Biden White House Freeze of Trump Executive Order Did NOT Cause Insulin Prices To Increase Not Repealed

Did a regulatory freeze on "any new and pending rules" put in place by the Biden Administration on January 20, 2021 cause the price of insulin to increase? No, that's not true: Among Trump's executive orders President Biden froze for 90 days was one aimed at saving insulin users money. The Trump order was to have required federally approved health centers pass along to patients any savings on the discounted prices the clinics receive on the purchase of insulin and epinephrine. But Biden's first-day-in-office order did not affect the current price of insulin to consumers for two reasons:

  1. The Trump executive order on insulin prices had not taken effect yet. It was not supposed to go into effect until January 22, 2021, two days after the Biden freeze.
  2. The Trump executive order only would affect prices for people receiving insulin through a community health center. It would have no bearing on the pharmacy prices patients not going to a federally approved health center would pay.

The claim appeared in a video post (archived here) published on Facebook on February 11, 2021. Among the quotes by a FaceBook user who identifed herself as Rachel Valentine in the 11-minute video:

"Last year under Trump our insulin payment went to $60 a month for this box. ... This is the first time I've gotten insulin prescription filled since Biden was inaugurated into office, and if you voted him in, I'm a little mad today. ... I paid $328 for this one box of insulin. ... I would have paid $500 without the coupon. ... If you think this is just the story of my family and what Biden has in store, you are SO blind!"

This is what the post looked like on Facebook at the time of writing:

Facebook screenshot

(Source: Facebook screenshot taken on Fri Feb 12 20:08:37 2021 UTC)

The video was originally posted February 9, 2021. It has been shared since then multiple times on the FaceBook pages of other users.

The woman in the video does not offer any documentation to show the prices she says she paid for the insulin, which she identifies as Novolog, either under the Trump or Biden administrations. She does not show any receipts.

It is also not clear whether the price of her prescription may have gone up significantly in January because she had not met any new applicable insurance deductible for 2021.

The issue of skyrocketing insulin prices precedes the Trump administration, a fact that has been widely documented.

The Journal of the American Medical Association noted on March 3, 2020 that from 2007 to 2018:

List prices of insulins ... increased by 262%, and net prices by 51%.

Similarly, the National Association of Community Health Centers, pointed out in a January 25, 2021 news release that:

From 2009-19, drug makers tripled the prices of common types of insulin in the U.S, for no evident reason.

This graphic from the Business Insider online issue of September 18, 2019 demonstrates the steep rise over a 10-year period.

5d541d6ecd97842f8d3c2ed7.jpeg

A January 5, 2021 article by Forbes detailed how bad the situation has become for patients:

Of the approximately 35 million Americans who have diabetes (Types 1 and 2), about a third require insulin to manage their disease. For diabetic patients, out-of-pocket costs for insulin can be a major expense, whether they are insured in the commercial market, enrolled in Medicare, or un- and underinsured.

For decades, list prices of insulin products have been soaring. ...

Ninety percent of commercially insured patients with Type 2 diabetes are prescribed the newer versions of insulin. These more effective and easier to administer formulations of insulin are costlier. Since 2012, list prices of many of these newer forms of insulin have risen particularly rapidly, with average annual increases of more than 15%.

Newer versions of insulin retail for between $175 and $300 a vial. Most patients with diabetes need two to three vials per month, and some can require more. So, without direct assistance from drug manufacturers, this amounts to a substantial monthly cost burden. There have been multiple reports of patients who cannot afford insulin products. Roughly a quarter of diabetic patients dependent on insulin skimp or even skip doses altogether.

Sixty-eight percent of uninsured patients pay the full list price for insulin, while 9% of privately insured and 3% of Medicaid beneficiaries do. Consequently, the uninsured are much more likely to report being unable to afford prescription medicines, by a 38% to 10% margin.

It was under those circumstances that then-President Trump signed executive orders in July 2020 that aimed to curb prescription prices. With regard to insulin prices, the Department of Health and Human Services trumpeted in a July 24, 2020 news release:

Today, President Donald Trump took historic action to deliver lower prescription drug prices to American patients. The President signed four Executive Orders on drug pricing directing the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to take several steps to deliver for American patients lower costs on prescription drugs, including insulin and epinephrine, and ensure Americans are getting the lowest price possible for their drugs.

According to the release, the executive orders instructed HHS to:

Require federally qualified health centers who purchase insulins and epinephrine in the 340B program to pass the savings from discounted drug prices directly on to medically underserved patients. This will increase access to life-saving insulin and epinephrine for the patients who face especially high costs among the 28 million patients who visit FQHCs every year, over six million of whom are uninsured.

FQHCs are Federally Qualified Health Care Centers, which provide primary medical care to underserved communities, totaling about 9 percent of U.S. residents.

But that measure did not address the needs of the majority of insulin users, as CNN pointed out in a February 1, 2021 article:

The rule only affects medications these centers purchased through the 340B drug discount program, not the prices of these drugs for the general public.

The Trump administration was aware of the order's limited reach, according to a January 27, 2021 report by Charlotte, N.C., NBC affiliate WCNC:

HHS finalized the rule in late December. But in publishing that final rule, HHS acknowledged "the economic impact is expected to be minimal" since the vast majority of patients who get insulin from community health centers already get discounted medication. In some cases, those patients receive a one-month supply of insulin for just $7, according to the report published in the Federal Register.

The Trump executive order was scheduled to take effect January 22, 2021, two days after Biden was sworn into office. But Biden chief of staff Ronald Klain issued a memorandum on January 20, 2021 titled "Regulatory Freeze Pending Review." That 90-day freeze affected several of Trump's executive orders, including the one on insulin, which now would go into effect March 22, 2021, if at all.

Such freezes, which affect new regulations that have not gone into effect, are common with incoming administrations as the new president and staff review leftover policy and consider new regulations. AFP notes that Trump chief of staff Reince Priebus issued a similar memo on January 24, 2017, four days after Trump took office.

The executive order was not popular with the groups that were supposed to implement it. CNN said:

Community health centers opposed the rule, saying it would backfire and make it harder for them to provide these medications, particularly during the pandemic. They already offer sliding fee discounts to low-income patients, according to the National Association of Community Health Centers, an industry group.

The community health centers association said in its January 25, 2021 news release "the regulation would have burdened them with excessive red tape without doing anything to lower how much drug companies charge for drugs." Said the group:

The stated aim was to cut drug prices. However, it triggered alarm among safety-net health care providers and bipartisan lawmakers because it would accomplish the opposite of what the Trump Administration intended -- ultimately making it harder for health centers to provide affordable life-saving services and prescription drugs -- especially during the pandemic. To be clear, the insulin and Epipen regulation that was frozen by the Biden Administration only affects medications purchased through the 340B drug discount program at health centers. The overall prices of insulin and Epipens across the country are not affected by the Trump Administration regulation or the recent action by the Biden Administration.

Asked for comment, HHS referred Lead Stories to the White House, which did not reply.

Want to inform others about the accuracy of this story?

See who is sharing it (it might even be your friends...) and leave the link in the comments.:

About Us

International Fact-Checking Organization Meta Third-Party Fact Checker

Lead Stories is a fact checking website that is always looking for the latest false, misleading, deceptive or inaccurate stories, videos or images going viral on the internet.
Spotted something? Let us know!.

Lead Stories is a:


WhatsApp Tipline

Have a tip or a question? Chat with our friendly robots on WhatsApp!

Add our number +1 (404) 655-4223, follow this link or scan the image below with your phone:

@leadstories

Subscribe to our newsletter

* indicates required

Please select all the ways you would like to hear from Lead Stories LLC:

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here.

Most Read

Most Recent

Share your opinion