Fact Check: COVID Spike Protein Created in Vaccines Are NOT Proven To Be 'Hijacking' Human Body DNA Repair

Fact Check

  • by: Dean Miller
Fact Check: COVID Spike Protein Created in Vaccines Are NOT Proven To Be 'Hijacking' Human Body DNA Repair Flawed Study

Has a Swedish university proved that the COVID-19 vaccine creates spike proteins that are "hijacking" the human body's DNA repair and adaptive immune mechanisms? No, that's not true: The claim was based on a preliminary research report, not a peer-reviewed science journal paper, and the university in question has withdrawn the draft after finding flaws with its methodology and conclusions.

The claim was made in a November 4, 2021, Vision Times article titled "Study Finds COVID Spike Protein Created in Vaccines 'Hijacking' Human Body DNA Repair and Adaptive Immune System Mechanisms - Vision Times" (archived here), which opened:

A recent study published by two Chinese scientists working for a university in Sweden has found evidence that the full length spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, the novel coronavirus that causes Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), damages a crucial DNA repair mechanism involved in the human body's adaptive immunity.

Users on social media only saw this title, description and thumbnail:

Study Finds COVID Spike Protein Created in Vaccines 'Hijacking' Human Body DNA Repair and Adaptive Immune System Mechanisms - Vision Times

A recent study out of Sweden has found the spike protein on SARS-CoV-2, utilized in COVID vaccines, is damaging the body's DNA repair and active immune systems.

Vision Times claimed the Swedish study shows that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein "significantly inhibits" the body's ability to repair DNA damage, which is essential to adaptive immunity.

Lead Stories contacted the authors and the research institute where they work, asking if Vision Times interpreted the study properly. No such conclusions can be drawn, wrote Professor Neus Visa, head of the department of molecular biosciences at Stockholm University's Wenner-Gren Institute, in a November 17, 2021, email to Lead Stories. She wrote:

No, the article does not prove that vaccine-generated spike proteins will hijack the human body's DNA repair mechanism and other adaptive immune system reactions. The study uses an artificial setup in vitro that cannot support conclusions about the effects of the spike protein in the body.

Visa wrote that while Stockholm University's research projects are "truth-seeking, free and unbound," peer review is essential. "We have evaluated the research presented in this article and found flaws in the quality of the work and data interpretation and therefore the authors have contacted the journal and requested the withdrawal of the article."

The journal that published is an "open access" journal, which scientists use to share early findings before they've been reviewed by peers and experts.

In contrast, formal scientific publication includes full public access to data and methodology, which editors send to competing and equally expert peers in advance of publication. Peer review is, in ideal cases, when errors in everything from math to logic are spotted and can be corrected, strengthening the final version of the paper, which is then subjected to rigorous editing by journal staff who are often experts in the field.

Lead Stories has written to the editors of the journal, Viruses, to learn what steps will be taken in response to Stockholm University's request that the article be withdrawn. At the time of writing, the article was still available, with no notice that problems had been identified. We will update this fact check, as appropriate, when they reply.

Want to inform others about the accuracy of this story?

See who is sharing it (it might even be your friends...) and leave the link in the comments.:

Lead Stories is working with the CoronaVirusFacts/DatosCoronaVirus Alliance, a coalition of more than 100 fact-checkers who are fighting misinformation related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Learn more about the alliance here.


  Dean Miller

Lead Stories staff writer Dean Miller has edited daily and weekly newspapers, worked as a reporter for more than a decade and is co-author of two non-fiction books. After a one-year Harvard Nieman Fellowship, he served as Director of Stony Brook University’s Center for News Literacy for six years. As Senior Vice President/Content at Connecticut Public Broadcasting, a dual licensee, he oversaw radio, TV and print journalists, and documentary producers. He moved west to teach journalism at Western Washington University, edit The Port Townsend Leader and write the twice-weekly Save The Free Press column for the Seattle Times. Miller won the 2007 national Mirror Award for news industry coverage and he led the team that won the 2005 Scripps Howard first amendment prize. 

Read more about or contact Dean Miller

About us

International Fact-Checking Organization

Lead Stories is a fact checking website that is always looking for the latest false, deceptive or inaccurate stories (or media) making the rounds on the internet.
Spotted something? Let us know!.

Lead Stories is a:


Follow us on social media

Most Read

Most Recent

Share your opinion