Fact Check: US Intelligence Does NOT Undercut DOJ With 'No Foreign Interference' Announcement

Fact Check

  • by: Ed Payne
Fact Check: US Intelligence Does NOT Undercut DOJ With 'No Foreign Interference' Announcement Not Same Thing

Did an announcement by U.S. intelligence officials that there's no foreign interference in U.S. elections through early September 2024 undermine the Department of Justice's indictment of alleged Russian operatives? No, that's not true: The Office of the Director of National Intelligence stated that there's no evidence of a "foreign actor" directly interfering in the process of conducting an election, while the Department of Justice is targeting an alleged Russian influence campaign. Influence campaigns are aimed at swaying public opinion rather than directly manipulating election infrastructure, which would constitute election interference.

The claim appeared in an article (archived here) published by ZeroHedge on September 7, 2024, titled "US Intel Undercuts DOJ's 'Foreign Interference' Claim Used To Smear Conservative Pundits." The story opens:

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) announced Friday [September 6, 2024] that it has not 'observed' any foreign interference in the 2024 election, seemingly undermining cynical remarks by Attorney General Merrick Garland.

The ODNI's Foreign Malign Influence Center (FMIC) stated in a 2-page report that the intelligence community 'has not observed any foreign actor seeking to interfere in the conduct of the 2024 elections.' Natalie Winters, a co-host of the Steve Bannon WarRoom podcast, first reported these findings.

This is what the article looked like on ZeroHedge at the time of writing:

chrome_Gbx690LWys.png

(Source: ZeroHedge screenshot taken on Tue Sep 10 18:11:27 2024 UTC)

Office of the Director of National Intelligence

The ZeroHedge report questions a specific line from an election security report (archived here) published by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) on September 6, 2024. It's an update on the intelligence community's (IC) findings 60 days out from the presidential election on November 5, 2024. The line cited in the ZeroHedge article from the ODNI report says:

To date, the IC has not observed any foreign actor seeking to interfere in the conduct of the 2024 elections.

The ZeroHedge report casts doubt on the Department of Justice's (DoJ) actions to halt a Russian influence operation and whether it really exists.

On September 4, 2024, the Biden administration (archived here) announced it had shut down Kremlin-run websites and charged two Russian state media employees in a move to counter what it claims are Russian efforts to spread disinformation ahead of the November presidential election.

Along with the charges, the U.S. government imposed sanctions and visa restrictions as part of its effort, just weeks before the election, to counter the ongoing threat from Russia, which officials have long warned could cause confusion and unrest among voters.

Election interference vs. election influence

There is no contradiction between the DOJ and the ODNI because they are addressing different issues. The Justice Department is discussing a Russian influence operation, while National Intelligence is referring to direct interference in the election process.

The ODNI explained the difference in a September 10, 2024, email to Lead Stories. The statement from an intelligence official said:

The Intelligence Community refers to the term election interference for efforts to degrade or disrupt the United States' ability to hold an election. This is separate from election influence.

We define election influence as efforts to shape election outcomes or undermine democratic processes. We have not observed any foreign actor seeking to interfere in the conduct of the 2024 elections.

The Intelligence Community does assess adversaries are focused on using information operations and propaganda to try to shape voter preferences or undermine confidence in the election. Nonetheless, this is a top priority and the Intelligence Community and our interagency election partners remain vigilant.

Read more

Additional Lead Stories fact checks of claims about the U.S. elections can be found here.

Want to inform others about the accuracy of this story?

See who is sharing it (it might even be your friends...) and leave the link in the comments.:


  Ed Payne

Ed Payne is a staff writer at Lead Stories. He is an Emmy Award-winning journalist as part of CNN’s coverage of 9/11. Ed worked at CNN for nearly 24 years with the CNN Radio Network and CNN Digital. Most recently, he was a Digital Senior Producer for Gray Television’s Digital Content Center, the company’s digital news hub for 100+ TV stations. Ed also worked as a writer and editor for WebMD. In addition to his journalistic endeavors, Ed is the author of two children’s book series: “The Daily Rounds of a Hound” and “Vail’s Tales.” 

Read more about or contact Ed Payne

About Us

International Fact-Checking Organization EFCSN Meta Third-Party Fact Checker

Lead Stories is a fact checking website that is always looking for the latest false, misleading, deceptive or inaccurate stories, videos or images going viral on the internet.
Spotted something? Let us know!.

Lead Stories is a:


WhatsApp Tipline

Have a tip or a question? Chat with our friendly robots on WhatsApp!

Add our number +1 (404) 655-4223, follow this link or scan the image below with your phone:

@leadstories

Subscribe to our newsletter

* indicates required

Please select all the ways you would like to hear from Lead Stories LLC:

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here.

Most Read

Most Recent

Share your opinion