Fact Check: Post Does NOT Prove 'No Kings' Rallies Participants Were Paid To Join Protests on March 28, 2026

Fact Check

  • by: Uliana Malashenko
Fact Check: Post Does NOT Prove 'No Kings' Rallies Participants Were Paid To Join Protests on March 28, 2026 Parody Account

Does a viral post prove that participants of the "No Kings" rallies in March 2026 were paid hourly to protest? No, that's not true: The claim purporting to show the first-person statement of a real protester was first posted by an account that previously referred to its content as parody. Two online detectors concluded that the account's profile picture was unlikely to show a real human.

The claim originated from a post (archived here and here) on X, where it was published on March 29, 2026. It opened:

Ok, I'm spilling the beans. Yesterday myself and several others were paid between $20 and $40 per hour to attend a No Kings protest. The reason many people don't talk about it is because it impacts our welfare payments if we disclose. MAGA cope and seethe.

This is what the post looked like on X at the time of writing:

image - 2026-03-30T103337.800.png

(Image source: post by @drritaded on X.)

The post reviewed in this fact check referenced March 28, 2026, rallies (archived here) that took place in multiple cities across the U.S., attracting thousands of participants.

The claim was initially posted by the account named @drritaded. Earlier, in December 2025, the account posted (archived here):

Bro, it's a parody called Dr Retarded. You still don't see it?

The account's bio (archived here and here) mentioned the R-word once again and claimed that the person behind it "escaped the USA" after sharing a plan to move to the U.K. in a November 2025 post (archived here). Describing itself as "PCF_LABEL_NONE," that account's bio also showed a comedy mask -- an icon consistent with X's self-selected label for Parody, Fan, and Commentary accounts on X (archived here), as seen, for example, here (archived here).

Two online AI detectors, InVID-WeVerify and Hive Moderation, placed the probability that the account's profile picture was was AI-generated at 83% and 100%, respectively.

Screenshot 2026-03-30 at 12.39.04 PM.png

(Image source: InVID-WeVerify.)

Screenshot 2026-03-30 at 12.16.56 PM.png

(Image source: Hive Moderation.)

Want to inform others about the accuracy of this story?

See who is sharing it (it might even be your friends...) and leave the link in the comments.:


  Uliana Malashenko

Uliana Malashenko joined Lead Stories as a freelance fact checking reporter in March 2022. Since then, she has investigated viral claims about U.S. elections and international conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine, among many other things. Before Lead Stories she spent over a decade working in broadcast and digital journalism, specializing in covering breaking news and politics. She is based in New York.

Read more about or contact Uliana Malashenko

About Us

EFCSN International Fact-Checking Organization

Lead Stories is a fact checking website that is always looking for the latest false, misleading, deceptive or inaccurate stories, videos or images going viral on the internet.
Spotted something? Let us know!.

Lead Stories is a:


Subscribe to our newsletter

* indicates required

Please select all the ways you would like to hear from Lead Stories LLC:

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here.

Most Read

Most Recent

Share your opinion