Fact Check: Muslims Did NOT Demand Locals Not Walk Dogs In Public, Saying It Was A Violation Of Sharia And "Disrespects" Them

Fact Check

  • by: Alexis Tereszcuk
Fact Check: Muslims Did NOT Demand Locals Not Walk Dogs In Public, Saying It Was A Violation Of Sharia And "Disrespects" Them

Did Muslims in Manchester, England, demand that locals not walk dogs in public since it is a violation of Sharia and "disrespects" them? No, that's not true: There is no proof that such a claim, which has been debunked before, came from the Muslim commmunity in Manchester. Yet the rumor has continued to circulate on social media since at least 2016.

The claim resurfaced in an article published by KLA News on February 26, 2020, titled "Muslims Demand Locals Don't Walk Dogs In Public - Violation Of Sharia And "Disrespects" Them - KLA News" (archived here) which opened:

In Mаnсhеѕtеr, раmрhlеtѕ hаvе bееn dіѕtrіbutе bу a grоuр саllеd Publіс Purіtу hаvе dеmаndеd thаt Brіtѕ dо nоt tаkе thеіr dоgѕ out іn рublіс as dоgѕ аrе соnѕіdеrеd іmрurе іn thе Islamic fаіth.

Thе grоuрѕ mеѕѕаgе іѕ thаt Brіtіѕh сіtіzеnѕ muѕt dо сеrtаіn things thаt may be соnѕіdеrеd unсоmfоrtаblе іn оrdеr tо mаkе іtѕ Muѕlіm сіtіzеnѕ fееl mоrе аt hоmе. Whу exactly thіѕ tуре оf whіnу, ultіmаtum іnduсіng bеhаvіоr wоuld mаkе citizens of a nоn-Iѕlаmіс nаtіоn саrе how іtѕ Muslim rеѕіdеntѕ fееl іѕ unсlеаr

Whаt іѕ сlеаr, hоwеvеr, іѕ that thіѕ tуре оf іntruѕіvе behavior frоm Muslim іmmіgrаntѕ hеlрѕ to еxрlаіn Brіtіѕh сіtіzеnѕ unwіllіngnеѕѕ tо rеmаіn in thе Eurореаn Unіоn.

Users on social media saw this:

Muslims Demand Locals Don't Walk Dogs In Public - Violation Of Sharia And "Disrespects" Them - KLA News

The claim is a hoax dating back to at least 2016, when, on July 11, the Facebook group calling itself For Public Purity posted:

That same group name was listed on the flyer posted in Manchester, England, the same year as the Facebook post - 2016 - that asked residents to "limit the presence of dogs in the public sphere" out of respect for the area's "large Muslim community." But the group's authenticity has been called out by The Telegraph, BuzzfeedNews.com and Snopes.com. As Buzzfeed.com and the Toronto Star jointly reported, similar signs, allegedly posted by the same group, appeared in Pitt Meadows, British Columbia, in 2017.

In both instances, Muslim leaders, as well as government officials, denied posting the flyers - raising the possibility that an anti-Islam hoax was at play. Local Muslim groups in Manchester, for example, said that they had never heard of For Public Purity and believed the flyers were an attempt to increase anti-Muslim sentiment.

BuzzfeedNews.com reported there was evidence that the flyer was "either started, or helped along, by 4chan trolls." The site noted users were posting about the public outrage and warned others to leave the full name of "the P-blicP-rity website" out so that their archives would not be searched and outed.

The For Public Purity Facebook page has not put up anything since the July 11, 2016, post.

Some commenters on the post were outraged:

"Take your Islam and LEAVE if you cannot integrate. You are Najes and impure. You are nothing but an evil terrorist. My dogs are PURER and CLEANER than a filthy person like you. Go back to the hellhole you raised in and stay away from our democracy."

However, others called out the post for the outrageous claims:

We're all being trolled - this is a fake page trying to stir up hatred between communities. Dogs do exist and roam freely in countries where Islam is the predominant religion. If they roam freely in places like Egypt and Turkey, why would Muslims try and ban them in public places in the UK?? Just think people!

Here is a snapshot of some of the back-and-forth on the For Public Purity page:


On April 4, 2018, the story circulated again on the Black Sphere Facebook page, a conservative website in the United States that shared the story with their followers - who were outraged.

With 6,000 likes and 4,000 shares on the Blake Sphere Facebook post, comments flowed in with anti-Muslim sentiment.

Want to inform others about the accuracy of this story?

See who is sharing it (it might even be your friends...) and leave the link in the comments.:

  Alexis Tereszcuk

Alexis Tereszcuk is a writer and fact checker at Lead Stories and an award-winning journalist who spent over a decade breaking hard news and celebrity scoop with RadarOnline and Us Weekly.

As the Entertainment Editor, she investigated Hollywood stories and conducted interviews with A-list celebrities and reality stars.  

Alexis’ crime reporting earned her spots as a contributor on the Nancy Grace show, CNN, Fox News and Entertainment Tonight, among others.

Read more about or contact Alexis Tereszcuk

Different viewpoints

Note: if reading this fact check makes you want to contact us to complain about bias, please check out our Red feed first.

About Us

International Fact-Checking Organization Meta Third-Party Fact Checker

Lead Stories is a fact checking website that is always looking for the latest false, misleading, deceptive or inaccurate stories, videos or images going viral on the internet.
Spotted something? Let us know!.

Lead Stories is a:


Subscribe to our newsletter

* indicates required

Please select all the ways you would like to hear from Lead Stories LLC:

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here.

Most Read

Most Recent

Share your opinion