Fact Check: States Were NOT Ordered To Fraudulently Inflate COVID-19 Cases 15 Times Actual Rate

Fact Check

  • by: Dean Miller
Fact Check: States Were NOT Ordered To Fraudulently Inflate COVID-19 Cases 15 Times Actual Rate No CDC Fraud

Were Texas and other states ordered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the World Health Organization to fraudulently increase by 15-fold the tally of COVID-19 cases? No, that's not true. The CDC gathers data based on the non-binding suggestions of the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists. Aside from that, Texas Department of State Health Services data show no 15-fold increase in reported cases in Collin County, which used as the basis for the claim.

The claim originated in a video and article (archived here) published by The Alex Jones Show on June 29, 2020, on the banned.video channel under the title "Breaking: States Ordered To Fraudulently Inflate COVID-19 Cases 15 Times Actual Rate." The video opened with a clip from what Jones dated as a May 18, 2020, public meeting of Collin County Commissioners Court in which officials explained changes in the way "probable" cases of COVID-19 are counted. Jones came out of the clip saying:

This is complete proof that the covid19 testing regime and the definitions they semantically use from the NIH and CDC are frauds. This has been confirmed. If one person tests positive for COVID 19, fifteen people in the computer model are then said to have it.

This is what the video looked like at the time of writing:

The Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists did send states new COVID-19 case-counting guidelines in May that directed public health officials to help chart the spread of COVID-19 by listing both confirmed cases and probable cases. That change reflected what field epidemiologists had noted, that people were spreading the contagion before they knew they were carriers and disease fighters needed an earlier warning.

Rather than wait for confirmed cases to show up, the epidemiologists urged public health officials to include in the count anyone for whom COVID-19 was the most likely explanation for symptoms such as high fever, respiratory difficulty and taste disorders. That way, CDC mapping would give public health officials advance notice where the contagion was moving, allowing time to warn the public to avoid events and venues where contagion spreads.

But the guidelines are non-binding and The Washington Post reported June 8, 2020, that less than half of all U.S. states had adopted the new tally, including large states such as California, Florida and New York.

Texas did adopt the new reporting scheme, but there has been no 15-fold rise in the number of cases there, according to these Texas data graphed by The New York Times, showing the July 3 total and the total at the time the new reporting rules were put into effect. The change over that period has been from 960 cases to 7,158, a seven-fold increase during a period when CDC data show the U.S. case total has doubled. Searching U.S. case data and state data, Lead Stories was not able to locate any instance of the 15-fold increase in reported cases referred to in Jones' claim.

Texas cases by day.Times.png

Texas cases by day.May 18.png

Here's how the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists explained their proposal to start counting probable cases along with confirmed cases:

Epidemiological reports from the field are demonstrating a growing importance of presymptomatic and asymptomatic infections from two lines of evidence: the serial interval of COVID-19 appears to be close to or shorter than its median incubation period and clusters linked to presymptomatic and asymptomatic index cases...

Here are the rules for counting suspected or probable cases, adopted April 5, 2020, and circulated for state approval:

In cases where a definite diagnosis of COVID-19 cannot be made, but it is suspected or likely (e.g., the circumstances are compelling within a reasonable degree of certainty), it is acceptable to report COVID-19 on a death certificate as "probable" or "presumed." In these instances, certifiers should use their best clinical judgement in determining if a COVID-19 infection was likely. However, please note that testing for COVID-19 should be conducted whenever possible.

Clinical Criteria: At least two of the following symptoms:

  • fever (measured or subjective),
  • chills,
  • rigors,
  • myalgia,
  • headache,
  • sore throat,
  • new olfactory and taste disorder(s)

At least one of the following symptoms:

  • cough,
  • shortness of breath, or,
  • difficulty breathing

Severe respiratory illness with at least one of the following:

  • Clinical or radiographic evidence of pneumonia, OR
  • Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

No alternative more likely diagnosis.

For this report, Lead Stories reached out to the office of Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, Texas Department of State Health Services, Collin County Public Health District, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and to the epidemiologist who drafted the new guidelines for the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists. This story will be updated as needed when they reply.

Want to inform others about the accuracy of this story?

See who is sharing it (it might even be your friends...) and leave the link in the comments.:

Lead Stories is working with the CoronaVirusFacts/DatosCoronaVirus Alliance, a coalition of more than 100 fact-checkers who are fighting misinformation related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Learn more about the alliance here.

  Dean Miller

Lead Stories Managing Editor Dean Miller has edited daily and weekly newspapers, worked as a reporter for more than a decade and is co-author of two non-fiction books. After a Harvard Nieman Fellowship, he served as Director of Stony Brook University's Center for News Literacy for six years, then as Senior Vice President/Content at Connecticut Public Broadcasting. Most recently, he wrote the twice-weekly "Save the Free Press" column for The Seattle Times. 

Read more about or contact Dean Miller

About Us

International Fact-Checking Organization Meta Third-Party Fact Checker

Lead Stories is a fact checking website that is always looking for the latest false, misleading, deceptive or inaccurate stories, videos or images going viral on the internet.
Spotted something? Let us know!.

Lead Stories is a:


Subscribe to our newsletter

* indicates required

Please select all the ways you would like to hear from Lead Stories LLC:

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here.

Most Read

Most Recent

Share your opinion