Fact Check: 'PCR' Test For COVID Does NOT Inflate Case Count By 90%

Fact Check

  • by: Dean Miller
Fact Check: 'PCR' Test For COVID Does NOT Inflate Case Count By 90% Apples/Oranges

Has the widely-used PCR test for COVID-19 returned false positive results, exaggerating the number of Americans infected? No, that's not true: The test accurately determines whether patients' nasal swabs show infection. But anti-quarantine-and-mask activists, who did none of their own reporting, have misused the results of a reporter's recent analysis of testing: it shows many who are infected may not be infectious. That's not the same thing as a false positive.

The claim originated in a Steve Deace Show video (archived here) published by Blaze Media on Sept. 1, 2020 on its Facebook page with the following text:

An explosive new piece from the New York Times confirms what some had speculated earlier this year...

This is what the post looked like on Facebook at the time of writing:

Deace-2020-09-15-12-36-UTC.png

(Source: Facebook screenshot taken on Tue Sep 15 19:36 2020 UTC)

Deace writes:

the way we're testing for the presence of the virus could be artificially amplified by as much as 90%!

In the video, Deace says:

It is possible we've overestimated our count by 90%.

Liz Wheeler made similar claims on One America News Network in a video entitled: 90% of COVID-19 Tests Should Be Negative:

Wheeler.bordered.2020-09-15-22-25-UTC.png

(Source: Facebook screenshot taken on Tue Sep 15 22:25 2020 UTC)

The title of Wheeler's piece, "90% OF POSITIVE COVID-19 TESTS SHOULD BE NEGATIVE" misuses Apoorva Mandavilli's reporting in the Aug. 29, 2020, edition of The New York Times.

Wheeler, who has a bachelor's degree in political science; and Deace, who told the New York Times he did not complete college, took their information from a report by Mandavilli: "Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn't Be." In that story, Mandavilli, who has a master of science degree in biochemistry, distills for readers the argument in the scientific community over use of high-sensitivity "polymerase chain reaction" testing merely to answer a yes/no question: "Has this person been infected?" Instead, some scientists argue, using a richer PCR test can show not only presence of the infection, but how much virus material is present.

To illustrate the debate, Mandavilli looked at data compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada that included the viral load each positive patient carried. Up to 90% of people testing positive carried barely any virus, The Times found. They were still infected, but whether very early or very late in their infection, they were unlikely to be contagious.

After anti-quarantine-and-mask activists like Deace and Wheeler used the Times' reporting to claim U.S. case data is inflated by false positives, Mandavilli took to Twitter to call attention to the difference between infection and infectious.

"A big NOPE," she wrote in a Sept. 3, 2020 series of Tweets, shown here.

Apoorva-thread-2020-09-15-19-03-UTC.png

Declaring the COVID-19 pandemic overblown, Deace cited as proof of a conspiracy to ramp up COVID-19 fears the controversy over a research paper by hydroxychloroquine advocate Dr. Didier Raoult, whose work influenced President Donald Trump's early cheerleading for the drug.

But Raoult's April paper -- in addition to advocating use of the anti-malarial drug the U.S. Food and Drug Administration decided does more harm than good -- makes one of the same points Mandavilli was careful to explain in her New York Times piece, which Deace and Wheeler did not: "...patients with Ct above 33-34 using our RT-PCR system are not contagious and thus can be discharged from hospital care or strict confinement for non-hospitalized patients." In other words, PCR testing can be used to measure infectiousness as well as simple infection and the difference is useful in clinical settings.

Didier-Raoult-2020-09-15 (7).png

Also available to Deace and Wheeler was the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention web page explaining the value of data collected on each infection, which is the reason the tally of confirmed cases is important.

Laboratory confirmation of cases, regardless of severity, is used to map the spread so that state and local public health officials can see trends and respond. On its website, the CDC says tests that confirm infection help state and local public health officials see trends in demographics, exposures and outcomes, which helps identify those groups most at risk and take steps to protect health care workers, racial/ethnic minorities, older adults, and people with underlying health conditions. Those data help the CDC write guidelines for the public and for healthcare providers.

For readers interested in how PCR tests amplify genetic samples to make them easier for machines to measure, here is a Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory video on the topic.

Want to inform others about the accuracy of this story?

See who is sharing it (it might even be your friends...) and leave the link in the comments.:

Lead Stories is working with the CoronaVirusFacts/DatosCoronaVirus Alliance, a coalition of more than 100 fact-checkers who are fighting misinformation related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Learn more about the alliance here.


  Dean Miller

Lead Stories staff writer Dean Miller has edited daily and weekly newspapers, worked as a reporter for more than a decade and is co-author of two non-fiction books. After a one-year Harvard Nieman Fellowship, he served as Director of Stony Brook University’s Center for News Literacy for six years. As Senior Vice President/Content at Connecticut Public Broadcasting, a dual licensee, he oversaw radio, TV and print journalists, and documentary producers. He moved west to teach journalism at Western Washington University, edit The Port Townsend Leader and write the twice-weekly Save The Free Press column for the Seattle Times. Miller won the 2007 national Mirror Award for news industry coverage and he led the team that won the 2005 Scripps Howard first amendment prize. 

Read more about or contact Dean Miller

About us

International Fact-Checking Organization

Lead Stories is a fact checking website that is always looking for the latest false, deceptive or inaccurate stories (or media) making the rounds on the internet.
Spotted something? Let us know!.

Lead Stories is a:


Follow us on social media

Most Read

Most Recent

Share your opinion