Fact Check: Viral Image Does NOT Show Two Bullets That 'Collided' During Battle Of Gallipoli

Fact Check

  • by: Christiana Dillard
Fact Check: Viral Image Does NOT Show Two Bullets That 'Collided' During Battle Of Gallipoli Didn't Collide

Does a viral image show two bullets that "collided" during the Battle of Gallipoli? No, that's not true: In addition to the lack of the expected rifling marks on one of the bullets, ballistics experts who reviewed the image were not convinced that the bullets "collided."

The image of a bullet going through another bullet that is used to make the claim has appeared on the Internet since at least 2015 (archived here). The image and the claim also appeared in a Facebook post (archived here) published on September 4, 2021. The post featured a graphic with an image of a bullet going through another bullet with text that read:

These two bullets collided in the battle of gallipoli in 1915, the chances of this happening are 1 in a billion. Name something more unlikely to happen...

The bottom of the graphic responded to the text and read:

3 bullets colliding

This is what the post looked like on Facebook on September 9, 2021:

Facebook screenshot

(Source: Facebook screenshot taken on Wed Sep 8 21:26:58 2021 UTC)

The Battle of Gallipoli, more commonly known as the Gallipoli campaign, took place between 1915 and 1916 during World War I. Member countries of the Allied powers waged the battle against Turkish forces, then known as the Ottoman Empire, over control of the Turkish straits.

In the image, the bullet going through the other bullet clearly displays rifling marks. "Rifling" refers to the grooves inside the barrel of a gun that spin a bullet for accuracy. The rifling marks on the bullet are circled in the graphic below:

bullet collision_LI.jpg

(Source: Facebook screenshot with rifling marks circled, from Wed Sep 8 21:21:17 2021 UTC)

The lack of rifling marks on the other bullet suggests that it was never fired.

Arthur Alphin, a firearms and ballistics expert and military historian, spoke with Lead Stories in a phone call on September 8, 2021. He said that he saw both the image and the actual bullets in question before, the latter as he toured museums in Çanakkale, a province in Turkey. We reached out to the Çanakkale Naval Museum, which contains bullets that appear similar to those in the image (see the second panel in the upper page of the brochure -- archived here), to confirm whether they are the same bullets. We will update the story with any response.

Regarding the origin story behind the bullets, Alphin said:

I have seen this photograph before and this photograph is not -- I say it again, not, not, not -- two bullets in flight that collided. Dollars to donuts, this was a deceased or disabled soldier laying on the ground, and as the long-range machine gun fire came in, a bullet struck his web gear.

Alphin went on to say:

The only time I have seen two bullets that met each other in flight -- there is one at the Gettysburg Museum. But you gotta remember, both of those were 58 calibers -- 580 thousandeths diameter -- .58 caliber, lead mini-balls, at a launch velocity of under 1,100 feet per second. So they could meet each other in flight and yeah, it is technically possible that they could kind of heat weld themselves together and fall to the ground.

Alphin said that by the time the weaponry of World War I was being used, guns that contained rifling were the standard.

In a phone call with Lead Stories on September 7, 2021, Leonard J. Romero, an independent firearms expert, presented other scenarios that the image could actually depict. The lack of rifling marks on the impacted bullets means that the bullet with rifling marks could have hit someone's cartridge belt or that the unfired bullet could have been dislodged from its cartridge case (see "Case, Casing" here).

Joshua Keena, a professional engineer with expertise in weapons engineering, gave a similar interpretation of the image in a phone call with Lead Stories on September 8, 2021. If the bullets collided in mid-air, "there would've been two sources of damage," he said: the collision between the bullets and damage caused by the bullets tumbling off other objects on the battlefield. According to Keena, the two most plausible scenarios are that one of the bullets was impacted on the battlefield or that the bullets were manipulated elsewhere.

During a phone call with Lead Stories on September 8, 2021, Chuck Stephenson, a former FBI agent and a certified firearms instructor, said that it would be impossible for him to definitively confirm or deny whether the two bullets collided in mid-air. However, he also said that "the chances are they probably didn't" interact during a collision or ricochet, considering that "a lot of things have to come together for those two bullets to hit and then weld together like that."

Want to inform others about the accuracy of this story?

See who is sharing it (it might even be your friends...) and leave the link in the comments.:


  Christiana Dillard

Christiana Dillard is a former news writer for Temple University’s Lew Klein College of Media and Communication. She received her undergraduate degree in English Writing from the University of Pittsburgh. She has been a freelance writer for several organizations including the Pittsburgh Black Media Federation, Pitt Magazine, and The Heinz Endowments. When she’s not producing or studying media she’s binging it, watching YouTube videos or any interesting series she can find on streaming services.

Read more about or contact Christiana Dillard

About us

International Fact-Checking Organization

Lead Stories is a fact checking website that is always looking for the latest false, deceptive or inaccurate stories (or media) making the rounds on the internet.
Spotted something? Let us know!.

Lead Stories is a:


Follow us on social media

Most Read

Most Recent

Share your opinion