Fact Check: Weatherman Did NOT Identify Military 'Spraying Chemtrails' On Radar -- It Was Anti-Radar Chaff

Fact Check

  • by: Sarah Thompson
Fact Check: Weatherman Did NOT Identify Military 'Spraying Chemtrails' On Radar -- It Was Anti-Radar Chaff Radar Decoy

Did a meteorologist in Oregon "admit the military was spraying chemtrails" while giving an evening weather forecast on television? No, that's not true: Weatherman Kevin Lollis pointed out an area on the weather radar map that he identified as chaff from a military exercise. He did not say the military was spraying chemtrails; he said they were dropping chaff, which he went on to describe. The existence of chaff and its defensive purpose, as a military countermeasure to hide aircraft from radar, is not a military secret. Various types of chaff have been in development since before World War II.

The video of News 10 meteorologist Kevin Lollis' April 8, 2010, forecast was reposted on YouTube the following day. A shortened clip of the old weather forecast resurfaced when the video was posted on Facebook on January 12, 2022. The caption added to the video reads:

Weatherman admits military is spraying chemtrails

This is how the post appeared at the time of writing:


(Image source: Facebook screenshot taken on Wed Feb 16 17:14:13 2022 UTC)

The clip posted to Facebook is 30 seconds long and cuts off abruptly before Lollis explains his Marine Corps experience. Embedded below is a more complete copy of that April 8, 2010, KTVL weather segment. Lollis does not use the term "chemtrails" or "spraying." After the 1:00 mark he explains:

We've got a bit of an unusual situation. Now, this first portion of the radar cycle is fairly bland and typical. But then you see these bands have very distinct cloud cover moving into the region. That is not rain, that is not snow, believe it or not, military aircraft flying through the region is dropping chaff ... small bits of aluminum, sometimes it's made of plastic or even metallic, metallicized paper products, but it's used as an anti-radar issue and obviously they're up there practicing. They won't confirm that, but I was in the Marine Corps for many years and I'll tell you right now that's what it is.

The use of chaff is not a military secret. In August 2002, the Air National Guard published a study titled, "Final Environmental Assessment for Deployment of Chaff and Flares in Military Operation Areas." This document is over 500 pages long and includes reports from specific Military Operation Areas (MOAs). On page 13 of the document, chaff is described this way:

Chaff has been used by DOD for over 50 years, both in combat and in training and testing. Chaff consists of small, extremely fine fibers of aluminum or, since the 1980s, aluminum-coated glass. These fibers disperse widely in the air when ejected from the aircraft, forming the electromagnetic equivalent of a visual smoke screen to temporarily hide the aircraft from radar. It also decoys radar, allowing aircraft to maneuver or egress from the area. In the air, the initial burst from a chaff bundle forms a sphere that shows up on radar screens as an electronic cloud. The aircraft is obscured by the cloud, which confuses enemy radar. Because chaff can obstruct radar, its use is coordinated with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

This report does not include an illustration of chaff.

Below is a U.S. Naval Research Laboratory image of two types of chaff canisters containing aluminum-coated glass fibers of varying lengths.


(Image source: U.S. Navy Naval Research Laboratory /Wikimedia commons)

The Air National Guard's report findings and conclusions are on pages 227-30. They say in part:

No significant impacts to human health are expected. Chaff particles are not expected to break down to respirable sizes in any appreciable quantities and the aluminum and silicon that make up chaff particles have low toxicity when either inhaled or ingested. Estimated total annual emissions of chaff by the military, worldwide, for both operational and training purposes is similar to the annual primary particle emissions from a single coal-powered generating station. The risk of exposure for humans to materials in flares is considered negligible because the primary component, magnesium, is not very toxic and the majority of the magnesium burns up before it reaches the ground.

Lead Stories has debunked a different claim on a viral photo that was identified as a ceremonial "Angel Flight" but was simply the smoke pattern from decoy flares. Lead Stories also reviewed a collection of photos and identified the aviation equipment that was misrepresented as proof of "chemtrail spraying."

Want to inform others about the accuracy of this story?

See who is sharing it (it might even be your friends...) and leave the link in the comments.:

  Sarah Thompson

Sarah Thompson lives with her family and pets on a small farm in Indiana. She founded a Facebook page and a blog called “Exploiting the Niche” in 2017 to help others learn about manipulative tactics and avoid scams on social media. Since then she has collaborated with journalists in the USA, Canada and Australia and since December 2019 she works as a Social Media Authenticity Analyst at Lead Stories.


Read more about or contact Sarah Thompson

About Us

International Fact-Checking Organization Meta Third-Party Fact Checker

Lead Stories is a fact checking website that is always looking for the latest false, misleading, deceptive or inaccurate stories, videos or images going viral on the internet.
Spotted something? Let us know!.

Lead Stories is a:


Subscribe to our newsletter

* indicates required

Please select all the ways you would like to hear from Lead Stories LLC:

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here.

Most Read

Most Recent

Share your opinion