Fact Check: US Constitution Does NOT Define Treason As Government Leaving 'Borders Not Protected'

Fact Check

  • by: Madison Dapcevich

STORY UPDATED: check for updates below.

Fact Check: US Constitution Does NOT Define Treason As Government Leaving 'Borders Not Protected' No Legal Basis

Does Article 3, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution state that treason is defined as the government leaving its "borders not protected" and does it declare "that the government will give comfort and aid to a hostile foreign invasion when the borders are not protected"? No, that's not true: Article 3, Section 3 makes no mention of borders. Rather, it defines treason, empowers Congress to punish treasonous acts and establishes limits on such punishments.

The claim originated in a video shared on Instagram on May 21, 2023, with a caption that reads:

We're witnessing the fall of our nation, all by design.

Share this to help spread the word and to join me in being awake & ready to resist evil agendas.

A speaker in the video falsely asserts the following:

Did you know that Article 4, Section 4 of the United States Constitution requires the government to defend and protect its borders? If our government does not uphold this, the Constitution authorizes its free citizens to defend and protect themselves and their state in place of a treasonous government.

Even more interesting is that under Article 3, Section 3 of the Constitution, it declares that the government will give comfort and aid to a hostile foreign invasion when the borders are not protected.

And that, my friends, is labeled treason.

Below is how the post appeared at the time of this writing:

Screen Shot 2023-06-08 at 12.19.39 PM.png

(Source: Instagram screenshot taken Thurs June 8 12:19:39 UTC 2023)

Praveen Fernandes, vice president of the think tank the Constitutional Accountability Center in Washington, D.C., confirmed to Lead Stories in an email received on June 14, 2023, that the "text of the Constitution does not 'declare' what the speaker does."

The claim made in the video is a misinterpretation of Article 4, Section 4 and Article 3, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution. Article 4 establishes states' powers in relation to one another, while Article 3 defines treason and sets forth punishment procedures.

However, Fernandes cautioned that the "question of how that text has been interpreted by courts is a little more complicated."

Article 4, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution

Article 4 defines citizenship and states' powers in relation to one other. It also establishes that states can create and enforce their own laws but must respect and enforce the laws of others, according to The National Constitution Center. Furthermore, Section 4 specifically states that the U.S. government will protect each state against invasion and domestic violence. It makes no such authorization that "free citizens" can "defend and protect themselves and their state in place of a treasonous government," nor does it establish the ability to "defend and protect its borders."

Article 4, Section 4 reads:

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

Article 3, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution

Article 3 "establishes and empowers the judicial branch of the national government," according to The National Constitution Center. More specifically, Section 3 defines treason, empowers Congress to punish treason, establishes how treason may be punished and places limits on those punishments. It does not declare that the government can comfort and aid foreign invasion when borders are unprotected and, in fact, makes no mention of borders.

Article 3, Section 3 reads:

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

Section 3 also requires that at least two witnesses testify to the treasonous act or that an individual accused of treason confess in court.

Interpretations of Article 3, Section 3 have varied over time, but in June 2023 the Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute defined treason as "the betrayal of one's own country by attempting to overthrow the government through waging war against the state or materially aiding its enemies." The institute also noted that 18 U.S.C § 2381 "states that a person guilty of treason against the United States 'shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.'"

Carlton Larson, an expert in American constitutional law and professor at UC Davis School of Law, confirmed to Lead Stories that the claim's interpretation is "clearly incorrect."
"Treason law requires the existence of an open state of war with a foreign enemy or group. We are in no such state of war with migrants coming to our borders," Larson told Lead Stories in an email received on June 15, 2023.

Lead Stories has also reported that the Constitution does not say that a candidate can win by simply declaring themself a political winner, that the U.S. Supreme Court did not find the U.S. guilty of "Constitutional Treason" in 1867 and that Title 10 and Executive Order 13912 does not override the Constitution, which states that the president is elected by the Electoral College.

Updates:

  • 2023-06-15T20:28:46Z 2023-06-15T20:28:46Z
    Adds quote from constitutional law expert.

Want to inform others about the accuracy of this story?

See who is sharing it (it might even be your friends...) and leave the link in the comments.:


  Madison Dapcevich

Raised on an island in southeast Alaska, Madison grew up a perpetually curious tidepooler and has used that love of science and innovation in her now full-time role as a science reporter for the fact-checking publication Lead Stories.

Read more about or contact Madison Dapcevich

About Us

International Fact-Checking Organization EFCSN Meta Third-Party Fact Checker

Lead Stories is a fact checking website that is always looking for the latest false, misleading, deceptive or inaccurate stories, videos or images going viral on the internet.
Spotted something? Let us know!.

Lead Stories is a:


WhatsApp Tipline

Have a tip or a question? Chat with our friendly robots on WhatsApp!

Add our number +1 (404) 655-4223, follow this link or scan the image below with your phone:

@leadstories

Subscribe to our newsletter

* indicates required

Please select all the ways you would like to hear from Lead Stories LLC:

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here.

Most Read

Most Recent

Share your opinion