Fact Check: Some Social Security Checks DO Still Go Through U.S. Postal Service

Fact Check

  • by: Eric Ferkenhoff
Fact Check: Some Social Security Checks DO Still Go Through U.S. Postal Service Mail Optional

Have no Social Security checks been delivered by the U.S. Postal Service since 2013 because of security issues with the U.S. mail? No, that's not true. While nearly 99% of Social Security and Supplemental Security Income benefits are electronically transfered to people's bank accounts each month, 1.2% of benefits -- or 850,000 checks -- are still mailed every month.

The claim appears in a post (archived here) published to Facebook on August 20, 2020. The post, a simple meme, read:

Social Security checks do not go through the postal service since 2013 because it's not secure. Let that sink in. 🤔"

This is what the post looked like on Facebook at the time of writing:

Facebook screenshot

(Source: Facebook screenshot taken on Mon Sep 21 13:21:55 2020 UTC)

The claim apparently relates to concerns about the volume of mail-in votes during the COVID-19 pandemic.

There is zero truth to the claim, according to the Social Security Administration, which makes clear on its site that an effort has been made since March 2013 to move to electronic deposit. But not all recipients want it that way. In a statement to Lead Stories, the SSA spokesman Darren Lutz wrote:

Currently, the Social Security Administration pays approximately 71.6 million (98.8%) Social Security and SSI benefits electronically per month and mails nearly 850,000 paper checks (1.2%) per month.

We currently mail paper Social Security Statements to workers age 60 and older who do not receive Social Security benefits and do not have a my Social Security account. We normally mail around 15 million paper Statements per year."

The same statement was given to The Associated Press, which also debunked the claim.

Many claims have circulated, including from President Trump, about the unreliability of the postal service and how reliance on mail-in voting could jeopardize the November general election.

A New York Times story from Aug. 31 explains the controversy in a story headlined: "Trump Is Pushing a False Argument on Vote-by-Mail Fraud. Here Are the Facts."

With concerns mounting over how the country can conduct elections during a pandemic and Democrats pressing for alternatives to in-person voting, President Trump has begun pushing a false argument that has circulated among conservatives for years -- that voting by mail is a recipe for fraud.

"Mail ballots, they cheat," Mr. Trump said at the White House on Tuesday afternoon. "Mail ballots are very dangerous for this country because of cheaters. They go collect them. They are fraudulent in many cases. They have to vote. They should have voter ID, by the way."

The president spoke as Wisconsin voters, many wearing protective masks, were going to the polls on a fraught Election Day, after the Republican-led legislature refused Democratic demands to delay the election and allow for expanded mail-in voting. On Wednesday, Mr. Trump claimed again that there was "tremendous potential for voter fraud."

The story found, among other things, that overall voting fraud is very rare and that states entirely voting by mail see "little" fraud. It also noted that Trump and other cabinet members recently voted by mail.

Trump, with no evidence to back up the claim, has said and tweeted that it's safe to vote by mail in states where the governors are Republican, but not secure in Democratic states.

On September 21, a judge dismissed a Trump campaign challenge to Nevada mail-in voting, according to USA Today:

A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed by President Donald Trump's reelection campaign that challenges a new state law sending ballots to all active voters amid the coronavirus pandemic.

The lawsuit lacks standing, according to U.S. District Judge James C. Mahan in a Sept. 18 order dismissing the lawsuit."

Want to inform others about the accuracy of this story?

See who is sharing it (it might even be your friends...) and leave the link in the comments.:

Lead Stories is working with the CoronaVirusFacts/DatosCoronaVirus Alliance, a coalition of more than 100 fact-checkers who are fighting misinformation related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Learn more about the alliance here.


  Eric Ferkenhoff

Eric Ferkenhoff has been a reporter, editor and professor for 27 years, working chiefly out of the Midwest and now the South. Focusing on the criminal and juvenile justice systems, education and politics, Ferkenhoff has won several journalistic and academic awards and helped start a fact-checking project at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, where he continues to teach advanced reporting. Ferkenhoff also writes and edits for the juvenile justice site JJIE.org.

 

Read more about or contact Eric Ferkenhoff

About us

International Fact-Checking Organization

Lead Stories is a fact checking website that is always looking for the latest false, deceptive or inaccurate stories (or media) making the rounds on the internet.
Spotted something? Let us know!.

Lead Stories is a:


Follow us on social media

Most Read

Most Recent

Share your opinion