Fact Check: EU Did NOT Vow To Ban 'Gendered Language' In Everyday Speech

Fact Check

  • by: Alexis Tereszcuk
Fact Check: EU Did NOT Vow To Ban 'Gendered Language' In Everyday Speech Fact Check: EU Did NOT Vow To Ban 'Gendered Language' In Everyday Speech Fact Check: EU Did NOT Vow To Ban 'Gendered Language' In Everyday Speech Fact Check: EU Did NOT Vow To Ban 'Gendered Language' In Everyday Speech Fact Check: EU Did NOT Vow To Ban 'Gendered Language' In Everyday Speech Fact Check: EU Did NOT Vow To Ban 'Gendered Language' In Everyday Speech A Suggestion

Did the European Union call for all "gendered language" to be banned in everyday speech? No, that's not true: The document on which the claim is based was a set of guidelines and suggestions published in 2019 by the European Institute for Gender Equality, which is not the governing body of the European Union and does not have the ability to pass legislation. Also, the document does not call for a ban or prohibition on any language. The Gender Equality website clearly states it is "an easy-to-use guide on how to use more gender-sensitive language" but never states the intention to "outlaw" any language.

The claim appeared in an article (archived here) published by The People's Voice on January 29, 2024, under the headline "EU Vows To Ban 'Gendered Language' In Everyday Speech." It began:

The European Union has called for all 'gendered language' to be banned, including completely innocuous sayings such as 'Joe Public' as well as words such as 'virile' which it claims are too macho and unfairly only associated with men.

This is what the article looked like at the time of writing:

Screen Shot 2024-01-31 at 10.19.33 AM.png

(Source: The People's Voice screenshot taken on Wed Jan 31 16:12:29 2024 UTC)

The document (archived here) cited in the article was a guidance published by the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) in 2019 titled, "Toolkit on Gender-sensitive Communication." It's listed as a "resource for policymakers, legislators, media and anyone else with an interest in making their communication more inclusive." The website (archived here) states the mission of the document:

This toolkit provides guidelines for the use of gender-sensitive language in writing. Gender-sensitive communication ensures that women and men - and those who do not conform to the binary gender system - are treated as persons of equal importance and dignity.

The EIGE is not a governing body that can pass laws for the European Union. The EIGE website (archived here) explains the organization's mission:

We are an independent centre and the primary source for information on gender equality in the European Union.

Nowhere within the document is it suggested that gendered language be prohibited or banned, least of all among private members of the public. Page 7 of the document describes its own purposes:

The key objectives of this document are to:
√ raise awareness about the importance of gender-sensitive language;
√ provide practical examples of what gender-biased and gender-discriminatory communication is and how to avoid it;
√ provide practical tools and advice for policymakers and all those involved in the drafting of documents for the public so that these texts are gendersensitive and inclusive for all members of the society;
√ provide useful checklists and examples for users.

Screen Shot 2024-01-31 at 11.36.35 AM.png

(Source: European Institute for Gender Equality website screenshot taken on Wed Jan 31 19:20:33 2024 UTC)

The People's Voice article also makes the claim:

Likewise, words which are usually associated with women, such as 'pushy' and 'shrill' must be outlawed, according to the EU, which has provided a list of acceptable terms to be used as replacements in everyday conversations by compliant citizens.

There is no mention of the word "outlawed" in the document. Instead, "examples of situations where women may be subject to invisibility or omission" are shown and alternatives are suggested, not mandated, on page 56 of the document.

Page 57 of the document lists "Examples of common adjectives that carry a gender connotation and alternatives," but does not outlaw them:

Screen Shot 2024-01-31 at 11.44.52 AM.png

(Source: European Institute for Gender Equality website screenshot taken on Wed Jan 31 19:23:13 2024 UTC)

Want to inform others about the accuracy of this story?

See who is sharing it (it might even be your friends...) and leave the link in the comments.:


  Alexis Tereszcuk

Alexis Tereszcuk is a writer and fact checker at Lead Stories and an award-winning journalist who spent over a decade breaking hard news and celebrity scoop with RadarOnline and Us Weekly.

As the Entertainment Editor, she investigated Hollywood stories and conducted interviews with A-list celebrities and reality stars.  

Alexis’ crime reporting earned her spots as a contributor on the Nancy Grace show, CNN, Fox News and Entertainment Tonight, among others.

Read more about or contact Alexis Tereszcuk

About Us

International Fact-Checking Organization Meta Third-Party Fact Checker

Lead Stories is a fact checking website that is always looking for the latest false, misleading, deceptive or inaccurate stories, videos or images going viral on the internet.
Spotted something? Let us know!.

Lead Stories is a:


WhatsApp Tipline

Have a tip or a question? Chat with our friendly robots on WhatsApp!

Add our number +1 (404) 655-4223, follow this link or scan the image below with your phone:

@leadstories

Subscribe to our newsletter

* indicates required

Please select all the ways you would like to hear from Lead Stories LLC:

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here.

Most Read

Most Recent

Share your opinion