Fact Check: 'Sovereign Settings' Do NOT Exist On X

Fact Check

  • by: Uliana Malashenko
Fact Check: 'Sovereign Settings' Do NOT Exist On X No Such Thing

Does a viral image confirm that now X has "sovereign settings" that allow users to opt out of the social media platform's rules, including moderation? No, that's not true: A search across X's Terms of Service page did not produce a match. Neither did X's Help Center or its revenue-sharing information.

The claim appeared in a post (archived here) published on X by @thinkingshivers on May 20, 2026. It opened:

just found out you can check this box in the settings and X won't be able to ban you

The attached image, resembling a screenshot, continued:

Sovereign Settings

Mark account as sovereign

By marking this account as sovereign, you withdraw consent to the Terms of Service and any implied contract with X Corp. The natural person behind this account is not subject to platform rules, community guidelines, or moderation actions. Learn more

Claim ad revenue share

Sovereign users are entitled to a proportional share of platform advertising revenue, remitted to the natural person

This is what that picture looked like on X at the time of writing:

HIzGZ9KWsAAMXWY.png

(Image source: post by @thinkingshivers on X.com.)

Lead Stories found zero evidence proving the existence of "sovereign settings" on X.

The list of options in the platform's settings, accessed from the U.S., said nothing about this:Screenshot 2026-05-22 at 5.03.59 PM.png

(Image source: X.)

The revenue-sharing information appeared in a different section than what the viral image showed, and its terms differed from what the post claimed:

Screenshot 2026-05-22 at 5.07.04 PM.png

(Image source: X.)

Screenshot 2026-05-22 at 5.08.20 PM.png

(Image source: X.)

The Terms of Service page (archived here) made no mention of such "sovereign settings," either:

Screenshot 2026-05-22 at 2.46.33 PM.png

(Image source: X.)

The X Help Center also showed no matches for such search terms:

Screenshot 2026-05-22 at 3.03.15 PM.png

(Image source: X.)

The viral image used the language of the so-called sovereign citizen movement (archived here), which believes the current government in the U.S. (or other countries where its members reside) is not a real one. This belief persists regardless of which party holds power. Members of the movement also engage in certain pseudo-legal activities, baselessly claiming that doing so exempts them from existing laws.

Want to inform others about the accuracy of this story?

See who is sharing it (it might even be your friends...) and leave the link in the comments.:


  Uliana Malashenko

Uliana Malashenko joined Lead Stories as a freelance fact checking reporter in March 2022. Since then, she has investigated viral claims about U.S. elections and international conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine, among many other things. Before Lead Stories she spent over a decade working in broadcast and digital journalism, specializing in covering breaking news and politics. She is based in New York.

Read more about or contact Uliana Malashenko

About Us

EFCSN International Fact-Checking Organization

Lead Stories is a fact checking website that is always looking for the latest false, misleading, deceptive or inaccurate stories, videos or images going viral on the internet.
Spotted something? Let us know!.

Lead Stories is a:


Subscribe to our newsletter

* indicates required

Please select all the ways you would like to hear from Lead Stories LLC:

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here.

Google Preferred Source

Get more fact-checks in your Google Search results by setting up leadstories.com as one of your preferred sources.

Most Read

Most Recent

Share your opinion